The review, evaluation and quality classification of Party members is carried out before summarizing the annual work of the organization or unit. When conducting the review, evaluation and classification of Party members, a record of evaluation and classification of Party members must be made.
1. What is the form of minutes of evaluation and classification of Party members?
The form of minutes of evaluation and classification of Party members is a form of minutes made when conducting meetings to evaluate and classify Party members. Sample minutes specifying meeting content, assessment and classification of Party members.
The form of minutes of evaluation and classification of Party members is a form of minutes used to record the process of meeting to evaluate and classify Party members.
see more: Sample minutes of vote counting and ranking the latest Party members 2023
2. Sample minutes of evaluation and classification of Party members:
PARTY COMMITTEE …………
DEPARTMENT ………….
Party group: …………
COMMUNIST PARTY OF VIETNAM
REPORT
THE PARTY GROUP ASSESSED THE QUALITY OF THE PARTY MEMBER YEAR 20……
At ….. hour ….. day ….. month ….. 20…..; Party group ……belongs to the Party cell: …….
Location: ………….(1)
Conference attendees; All party members in the group. (2)
Total number of party members: …………… Address/c; Present: …………. A/C; Absence: ……………..D/c
Names of absent party members: (3)
twelfth ………….
Reason for absence: ……..
Conference Chair: ………… (4)
Conference Secretary: …………(5)
Contents of the party meeting: The conference heard the Party leader approve the content of Plan No. 244-KH/DU, dated …../…../20….. of the Company’s Party Committee on guiding the assessment of the quality of the CSO and the Party. 20th year member… and some guiding documents of superiors. (6)
The conference in turn approved the self-criticism report and the self-classification of each member of the Party Group, the conference heard the chairperson summarize the comments of the party committee in the place of residence and opinions on the development of the Party Committee. vote, contribute ideas to the content of each party member’s review and vote to agree on the assessment and classification for each party member in 20…, specifically as follows:
I – Evaluation for each member of the party group:
1. Full name of party member ……………………(7)
– Party members present a report of self-criticism of party members in front of the party group, individuals self-recognize the level of task completion ..(8)
– The chairperson summarizes the comments of the party committee where the party member resides …………(9)
– Contributions of the conference: (10)
1.1. Comrades ……….
1.2. Comrades ……….
– Comrade chaired the meeting to summarize, conclude and vote of party members in the group: (11)
Voting conference at the level of party members eligible for Excellent HT NV: …………
The meeting voted at the level of party members eligible to Complete Well NV: ……..
Meeting to vote at the level of qualified party members Complete NV: ………….
HN votes at the level of party members violating the qualifications (not completing the NV): ……..
2. Full name of party member …………
– Party members present a report of self-criticism of party members in front of party groups and individuals who self-recognize the level of task completion…
– The chairperson summarizes the comments of the party committee where the party member resides ……..
– Contributions of the conference:
2.1. Comrades ……..
2.2. Comrades ………….
The Chairman of the conference summarizes, concludes and votes of party members in the group:
The meeting voted at the level of party members eligible for the Excellent HT NV: ………….
The meeting voted at the level of party members eligible to Complete Well NV: …………..
Voting conference at the level of qualified party members Complete NV: …………
HN votes at the level of party members violating the qualifications (not completing the NV): …………..
3. Full name of party member ……………….
– Party members present a report of self-criticism of party members in front of party groups, individuals self-recognize the level of task completion ….
– The chairperson summarizes the comments of the party committee where the party member resides …………
– Contributions of the conference:
3.1. Comrades ……..
3.2. Comrades ……….
The Chairman of the conference summarizes, concludes and votes of party members in the group:
The meeting voted at the level of party members eligible for the Excellent HT NV: ………….
The meeting voted at the level of party members eligible to Complete Well NV: ……..
Meeting to vote at the level of qualified party members Complete NV: …………..
HN votes at the level of party members violating the qualifications (not completing the NV): …………..
II – Summary of the entire Party group: (12)
– Number of Party members who are eligible for HTTNV ………… = …………%
– Number of party members who are eligible for HTNV …………. = ………….%
– Number of party members violating their qualifications (not affiliated) …….. = ………….%
The meeting ended at ….. hour ….. day ….. month ….. year 20 ….., in the meeting there were no other opinions and unanimously approved the minutes./.
Secretary. T/M GROUP
4. Guidelines for drafting minutes of Party member evaluation:
(1): Fill in the meeting place
(2): Fill in participants
(3): Enter the name of the absent Party member, reason
(4): Enter the name of the conference host
(5): Enter the name of the conference secretary
(6): Fill in the meeting content
(7): Enter the full name of the Party member
(8):Report of Party members
(9): Fill in the comments of the party committee where the party member resides.
(10): Fill in the comments of the conference
(11): Fill in the summary, conclusions and votes of party members
(12): Fill in the general information of the entire Party group
5. Regulations on evaluation and quality classification of Party members:
– Legal basis: Guidance No. 21-HD/BTCTW
* Evaluate and rank the quality of party members
– First, about the object
Party members throughout the Party (except for party members who are exempt from work and activities, and who are suspended from party activities). For members whose activities are suspended, the Party Committee still has to evaluate and rank the quality.
– Second, about the evaluation criteria framework
– On political ideology; moral qualities, lohi living; idea discipline organization; working style and manners
+ Political ideology: Loyalty to Marxism-Leninism, Ho Chi Minh’s thought and the Party’s renewal line; implementing, propagating and mobilizingìGovernment and people implement the guidelines and lines of the Party, policies and laws of the State; studying resolutions and directives, participating in political activities to improve political bravery and revolutionary outlook on life.
+ Moral qualities, lifestyle: Results of studying and following Ho Chi Minh’s thought, morality and style; the preservation of morality and lifestyle, promoting the vanguard,Heymodel of party members and close relations with the people; the spirit of seeking, listening, absorbing, correcting shortcomings and fighting with manifestations of bureaucracy, corruption, wastefulness and negativity; sense of building locality, agencies and units and preserving internal solidarity.
+ The sense of organizational discipline: The observance of the organization’s assignment; implement regulations on what party members are not allowed to do and internal rules and regulations of localities, agencies and units; the principles and regime of party activities, payment of party fees according to regulations; exemplary in performing civic duties and keeping regular contact with the branch committees and party committees of the locality where they reside; responsibility to set an example of party members.
+ Working style and manners: Dynamic, creative, drastic in performing tasks; scientific, democratic and principled working method; spiritbelchp cooperate, help comrades, colleagues.
+ The results of the struggle to prevent and combat the manifestations of deterioration in political thought, morality, lifestyle, “self-expression of tragedy”.unmarketablen”, “self-transformation” of the individual (if any).
– Regarding the results of the performance of assigned duties and tasks
+ The performance of responsibilities and powers according to regulations (party, government, mass organizations).
+ The results of the implementation of the assigned targets and tasks in the year are quantified by products. For party members who are cadres, civil servants and public employees, it is necessary to clarify the volume, quality, progress and efficiency of the implementation of the assigned targets and tasks in the year; spirit of innovation, creativity, self-responsibility; awareness, attitude to serve the people…
+ Results of assessment and classification of organizations, agencies and units under the scope of direct leadership and management; periodic credit assessment results (if any).
– The implementation of the commitment to cultivate, practice and strive every year
– The results of overcoming limitations and shortcomings have been grantedooh authority to conclude or be indicated in previous reviews
– The result of the test according to the suggestion idea of the competent authority (if cooh)
– Third, about the standard framework of quality levels
– Successfully completing the task
+ Being a really typical member of the Party in terms of capacity, moral qualities, lifestyle, always at the forefront of innovation, having specific quantifiable products, having many outstanding achievements in work recognized by the Party. other members learn and follow.
+ Criteria for the main task performance childrenAll assigned students are assessed at the level of “Excellent”; The remaining criteria are assessed as “Good” or higher.
+ Party members being cadres, civil servants and public employees must be classified as cadres, civil servants and public employees “Excellently completing tasks”.
Competent authorities consider and decide that the number of party members classified as “Excellent in completing tasks” must not exceed 20% of the number of party members classified as “Completing tasks well” in each grassroots party organization.
– Complete the task well
– The criteria for the performance of the assigned political tasks are assessed at the level of “Good” or higher; The rest of the criteria are assessed as “Average” or higher.
– Party members who are cadres, civil servants and public employees must be classified as cadres, civil servants or public employees of “Complete tasks well” or higher.
– Complete mission
– The basic criteria are assessed at “Average” level or higher.
– Party members being cadres, civil servants or public employees must be classified as cadres, civil servants and public employees “Complete tasks” or higher.
– Failure to complete the mission
Being a party member who did not reach the level of “Completing the task” or belonging to one of the following schools:belchthe following p:
– Competent authorityunmarketableThe evaluation essay shows signs of deterioration in political thought, morality, lifestyle, “self-evolution”, “self-transformation”.
– Only completed less than 50% of the assigned targets and tasks in the year.
– Party members are cadres, civil servants and public employees classified at the level of “Failing to complete tasks”.
– Party members are disciplined during the year (a violation is subject to disciplinary action only once when grading).
– Fourth on responsibility and authority
– Grassroots Party Committees and grassroots branches shall assume the prime responsibility for organizing the implementation, considering and deciding on the quality rating level of party members.
– Each party member self-evaluates and ranks the quality.
* How to perform
– Step 1: Self-assessment, xunmarketablep quality grade
Based on the evaluation criteria, quality level standards are specified for each object, party members self-analyze the quality (determine the level of “Excellent”, “Good”, “Average”, ” Poor” for each specific evaluation criterion) and consider and self-recognize the quality level in Form 02; report to the branch in the meeting to review, evaluate and rank the quality of party members at the end of the year.
– Step 2: Decision on quality rating for party members
– Branch Party Committee (Secretary of a branch where there is no branch committee) Generalbelchp level of self-classification of party members; opinions and comments of the Party committees and grassroots Party committees where the party members reside to propose the classification level of each party member. The branch conducts discussion on the rating proposed by the branch committee (the secretary of the branch where there is no branch committee) before voting.
– The Party Committee (secretary of the branch where there is no branch committee) organizes for party members to vote and propose the classification level for each member of the branch; then, the sum hbelchp of the results, propose a quality rating for each party member to report to the grassroots party committee.
– Assistant department at the general committee levelbelchp, appraise reports of affiliated branches for grassroots party committees to consider and decide on quality classification of party members. For grassroots branches, the Party cells shall decide to classify the quality of party members.
Chuyên mục: Biễu mẫu
Nhớ để nguồn bài viết: Mẫu biên bản đánh giá, xếp loại Đảng viên mới nhất 2023 của website thcstienhoa.edu.vn